We asked Senior Design Development Engineer, John, about some of the basics of AI, what’s holding AI back in the medical sector and how AI might impact the role of design engineers in the future:
People often confuse AI and connected devices (or the IoMT) however, it’s important to know the differences and associated implications for medical device development.
Connected Devices: The device or endpoint can monitor specific data on a patient and send that data to a retriever, such as the cloud, to be downloaded by a clinician who can then monitor the results and make decisions on a therapy or treatment.
AI / Machine Learning: Instead of sending the data to a clinician to process, it goes via an algorithm that can either process it fully (which the regulations don’t currently allow) or, partially so that it lightens the physicians load by making suggestions i.e. *This is potentially a cyst – review this patient*.
Regulations don’t currently allow full AI in medical devices because of the risk involved however, many argue that a AI is better or more reliable than a human resource in some ways because AI doesn’t suffer in the same ways that humans do i.e they don’t come to work a bit hungover, tired, or in a bad mood following an argument with their partner…
Although humans currently have higher cognitive and mental processing ability, computers are unbiased and by now, they aren’t far away from human ability. Actually, AI is set to outperform humans by 2040.
Currently, the law in the UK dictates that any data coming from a medical device has to be reviewed by a human. So, even though we could design a very simple device that incorporates AI to interpret a standard urine test for example, the regulations would not allow it.
Regulations are slow whereas the tech and med tech industries are incredibly fast paced and ever developing new technology and systems therefore, regulators cannot catch up. So, although AI as a technology is ready to go for a number of medical applications, the regulations won’t allow it. Regulations are already years behind whereas technology continues to advance.
Interoperability is another issue we’re currently facing. We have all of these different systems, software’s, programmes and bits of code globally, but they are inoperable with each other. They have all been designed in isolation therefore, there is no fluid language which makes for a big technical hold back when it comes to AI. For example, a heart scanner may be gathering data however, a different system to the one its being used with may not be able to interpret that data without it being re-written.
The main factor that will drive this is cost. Regulators receive a lot of pressure from the governments who fund them therefore, if there’s a significant cost benefit associated with the change, this will often influence them to speed things up.
Risk is also a big factor not only for regulators but also for users. People’s views on new technologies often take some time to adapt due to lacking trust for example, when someone goes for a specific procedure like a scan, they expect a certain protocol and for the data to be reviewed by a doctor. If a computer has reviewed it, they may lack trust and request a second opinion from a human regardless.
I think people will continue to welcome developments in AI very gradually.
If you reflect on 50 years ago, people would be very sceptical of wearing technology such as a smart watch to measure parameters such as heart rate or even driverless vehicles, whereas now, people are not only fine with it but, actively pursuing it.
Gradually, people will become more comfortable with AI. It’s already happening and is happening fast in other less-regulated sectors. The wider population are yet to see the true benefits of AI in the medical device and healthcare space.
We can’t be complacent – we must accept that AI is going to be a part of our day to day in some form and embrace it. It already is to some degree; we heavily rely on CAD and FEA whereas in the past, you would require advanced mechanical engineers to quickly calculate elements such as stresses and strains.
I think if we’re complacent and we don’t get more comfortable with AI as well as continue to build expertise in the area, not just in medical but in all sectors, we will inevitably get left behind. These days, basic CAD packages can easily be downloaded by anyone.
I think we should be mindful of continuously upskilling ourselves in avenues such as risk assessment or creative thinking – activities that are more difficult for a computer to do (at least in the shorter term).
Technical Director
John represents regulatory affairs on the board. He manages our quality management system, as well as ensuring tools and systems are in place for the teams to effectively perform.
John holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial and Product Design along with over 15 years’ experience in medical device development. John has particular expertise in the design, development and industrialisation of medical electrical equipment.
Get In Touch
Explore inside a sustainable inhaler - do reusable designs really offer an eco-friendly solution, or is there more to consider than reusability....
Discover how Haughton Design's diverse team leverages their extensive experience to drive innovation in device development. Learn about our expertise and unique insights that ensure successful project...
Explore how commercial constraints influence innovation in businesses. Discover whether budget limits, regulations, and market pressures drive creativity or stifle progress in today's competitive land...
HD strive to foster effective collaboration on all projects to push boundaries in innovation. We discuss how collaboration with the NHS can provide unique insight....
Why do we trust the accuracy of digital devices more than their non-digital counterparts? HD discuss the 'why' and how this improves device development....
We discuss the whether the medical device industry can embrace paper as a viable alternative to plastic as we advance towards Net Zero....
What is the impact of emerging technologies on medical device and product development? Design Engineer, Dan Kirkham, discusses their applications....
We discuss transforming medical device development through the utilisation of interdisciplinary, and cross industry teams....
A pharmaceutical company approached HD to enhance the performance and improve the usability of a Dry Powder Inhaler within a short timeframe and, a tight budget. ...
Pharmapack 2024 was a captivating blend of innovation, collaboration, and foresight. Read our round up of the eco-focused event here....
2023's DDL event brought together industry experts in the field of respiratory health. Here we discuss the latest breakthroughs and innovations....
Should Human Factors as a standalone discipline be made redundant? Design Engineer, Elena, considers this for medical device development?...
Can we achieve the perfect balance of usability, sustainability & connectivity in medical device design? Design Engineer, Rob, considers how....
2023's PDA & PODD conferences provided valuable insight into the drug delivery industry. Here we discuss trends and hot topics from the conferences....
Ahead of the 20th PDA Universe of Pre-Filled Syringes and Injection Devices Conference, we cover where medical device innovations are expected to go....
As the world becomes increasingly connected and user needs constantly evolving, the design of safety critical IFU’s must keep up with this. Design Engineer, Rob, discusses the future of IFU’s, and...
